Will apportionment of responsibility for misleading conduct erode the consumer protection potency of the Trade Practices Act 1974?

Christensen, Sharon A. & Stickley, Amanda P. (2006) Will apportionment of responsibility for misleading conduct erode the consumer protection potency of the Trade Practices Act 1974? Australian Business Law Review, 34(2), pp. 119-138.

View at publisher


In the past arguments advocating the stemming of the ever arching reach of the misleading and deceptive conduct provisions of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) by limiting damages awards to loss for which the contravenor is responsible, has fallen largely on deaf judicial ears. While some members of the judiciary have advocated a fair and just remedial response to misleading conduct based on responsibility of others, while accepting responsibility should play an integral part, have not been prepared to take this step without express legislative authority. The landmark High Court decisions of Henville v Walker (2001) 206 CLR 459; 182 ALR 37 and I&L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (2002) 210 CLR 109; 192 ALR 1 rather than dampening past criticisms added further impetus to the calls for legislative reform, which have been answered by the introduction of the concepts of contributory negligence and proportionate liability to the TPA. While the new provisions provide the courts with discretion to distribute liability for loss based upon responsibility, the judicial attitudes expressed in previous decisions raise new questions about how the existing consumer protection policy of the TPA will interact with the new apportionment provisions. This article aims to examine how, in light of past judicial utterances, a fair and just remedial response will be maintained consistent with the consumer protection purposes of the Act.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

1,855 since deposited on 19 Oct 2007
182 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 10249
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
ISSN: 0310-1053
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Law not elsewhere classified (180199)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2006 Thomson Legal and Regulatory
Copyright Statement: Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.
Deposited On: 19 Oct 2007 00:00
Last Modified: 22 Jun 2017 14:39

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page