Reliability of a Measure of Prediagnosis Physical Activity for Cancer Survivors
Lynch, Brigid M., Owen, Neville, Newman, Beth M., Pakenham, Kenneth, Leggett, Barbara, Dunn, Jeff, & Aitken, Joanne F. (2006) Reliability of a Measure of Prediagnosis Physical Activity for Cancer Survivors. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 38(4), pp. 715-719.
Purpose: This study was conducted to examine the test-retest reliability of a measure of prediagnosis physical activity participation administered to colorecial cancer survivors recruited from a population-based state cancer registry. Methods: A total of 112 participants completed two telephone interviews. I month apart, reporting usual weekly physical activity in the year before their cancer diagnosis. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard en-or of measurement (SEM) were used to describe the test-retest reliability of the measure across the sample: the Bland-Altman approach was used to describe reliability at the individual level. The test-retest reliability for categorized total physical activity (active, insufficiently active, sedentary) was assessed using the kappa statistic. Results: When the complete sample was considered, the ICC ranged from 0.40 (95% Cl: 0.24, 0.55) for vigorous gardening to 0.77 (95% Cl: 0.68, 0.84) for moderate physical activity. The SEM, however, were large. indicating high measurement error. The Bland-Altman plots indicated that the reproducibility of data decreases as the aniount of physical activity reported each week increases The kappa coefficient for the categorized data was 0.62 (95% Cl: 0.48, 0.76). Conclusion: Overall. the results indicated low levels of repeatability for this measure of historical physical activity. Categorizing participants as active, insufficiently active, or sedentary provides a higher level of test-retest reliability.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||colorectal cancer, test, retest reliability, exercise walking LONG, TERM RECALL, QUALITY, OF, LIFE, AUSTRALIAN ADULTS, RETEST RELIABILITY, EXERCISE, QUESTIONNAIRE, PARTICIPATION|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES (111700) > Epidemiology (111706)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > ONCOLOGY AND CARCINOGENESIS (111200) > Oncology and Carcinogenesis not elsewhere classified (111299)
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Health Research|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 Williams & Wilkins|
|Deposited On:||08 Nov 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:24|
Repository Staff Only: item control page