Applying CDA to the Analysis of Productive Hybrid Discourses in Science Classrooms
Hanrahan, Mary U. (2002) Applying CDA to the Analysis of Productive Hybrid Discourses in Science Classrooms. In Australian Association for Research in Education Conference (AARE), 1-5 December, Brisbane, Australia.
Alienation from science has sometimes been linked to the dominant discourse practices of secondary science classrooms. Differences in primary language practice have been related to social class, which has been a major referent in the discussion of equity issues in education (cf. Bernstein, 2000; Bourdieu, 1974; Lankshear, 1994; Lankshear, Atweh, & Christensen, 1994; the New London Group, 1996). A mismatch between the expectations of educators and the primary language practices of the majority of students is seen as leading to a cycle of increasing disadvantage for already disadvantaged students. In some areas of the curriculum, mass education in recent decades has prompted empowering curriculum reform, with accompanying changes in pedagogic discourses, to accommodate the needs of students from a wide range of backgrounds and promote social justice. However, in secondary science education, with its tendency towards elitism (Lemke, 1990; O'Loughlin, 1992), evidence of such changes is harder to find. However, it does exist and I believe it should be highlighted. My current project will use CDA to explore challenges to the dominant discourse in teacher-student interactions in science classrooms (cf. Luke, 2002).
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
Repository Staff Only: item control page