Subbasal nerve fiber regeneration after LASIK and LASEK assessed by noncontact esthesiometry and in vivo confocal microscopy: prospective study
Darwish, Taym, Brahma, Arun, O'Donnell, Clare, & Efron, Nathan (2007) Subbasal nerve fiber regeneration after LASIK and LASEK assessed by noncontact esthesiometry and in vivo confocal microscopy: prospective study. Journal Of Cataract And Refractive Surgery, 33(9), pp. 1515-1521.
PURPOSE: To evaluate recovery of the corneal subbasal nerve plexus and corneal sensitivity after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK). SETTING: Manchester Centre for Vision, Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, United Kingdom. METHODS: Thirty LASEK patients and 20 LASIK patients had slit-scanning confocal microscopy and noncontact corneal esthesiometry preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Images of the subbasal nerve plexus were analyzed using customized software to evaluate nerve regeneration. RESULTS: Central corneal sensitivity decreased significantly 1 month after LASEK and LASIK and returned to normal levels after 3 months. Corneal subbasal nerve fiber density, nerve branch density, nerve fiber length, and nerve fiber width decreased significantly 1 month after LASIK and had not returned to the preoperative levels by 6 months. Nerve fiber tortuosity decreased significantly 1 month after LASEK and returned to the preoperative levels 3 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in nerve fiber tortuosity before and after LASIK. Neither corneal sensitivity nor nerve fiber morphology was different between the 2 groups at any postoperative visit. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal sensitivity and subbasal nerve morphology were adversely affected by LASEK and LASIK. Corneal sensitivity recovered 3 months after the procedure, but subbasal nerves were still abnormal after 6 months. Despite the different forms of surgical trauma to corneal nerves with LASIK and LASEK, there was no apparent difference in the time course of recovery of corneal structure and function.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||For more information, please refer to the journal's website (see hypertext link) or contact the author.|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300) > Vision Science (111303)
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Health Research|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2007 Elsevier|
|Deposited On:||20 Dec 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:40|
Repository Staff Only: item control page