Corneal confocal microscopy detects early nerve regeneration after pancreas transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes
Mehra, Sanjay, Tavakoli, Mitra , Kallinikos, Panagiotis A. , Efron, Nathan, Boulton, Andrew J. , Augustine, Titus, & Malik, Rayaz A. (2007) Corneal confocal microscopy detects early nerve regeneration after pancreas transplantation in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 30(10), pp. 2608-2612.
OBJECTIVE: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, noninvasive, clinical examination technique that quantifies small nerve fiber pathology. We have used it to assess the neurological benefits of pancreas transplantation in type 1 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In 20 patients with type 1 diabetes undergoing simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) and 15 control subjects, corneal sensitivity was evaluated using noncontact corneal esthesiometry, and small nerve fiber morphology was assessed using CCM. RESULTS: Corneal sensitivity (1.54 +/- 0.28 vs. 0.77 +/- 0.02, P < 0.0001), nerve fiber density (NFD) (13.8 +/- 2.1 vs. 42 +/- 3.2, P < 0.0001), nerve branch density (NBD) (4.04 +/- 1.5 vs. 26.7 +/- 2.5, P < 0.0001), and nerve fiber length (NFL) (2.23 +/- 0.2 vs. 9.69 +/- 0.7, P < 0.0001) were significantly reduced, and nerve fiber tortuosity (NFT) (15.7 +/- 1.02 vs. 19.56 +/- 1.34, P = 0.04) was increased in diabetic patients before pancreas transplantation. Six months after SPK, 15 patients underwent a second assessment and showed a significant improvement in NFD (18.04 +/- 10.48 vs. 9.25 +/- 1.87, P = 0.001) and NFL (3.60 +/- 0.33 vs. 1.84 +/- 0.33, P = 0.002) with no change in NBD (1.38 +/- 0.74 vs. 1.38 +/- 1.00, P = 1.0), NFT (15.58 +/- 1.20 vs. 16.30 +/- 1.19, P = 0.67), or corneal sensitivity (1.23 +/- 0.39 vs. 1.54 +/- 00.42, P = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS: Despite marked nerve fiber damage in type 1 diabetic patients undergoing pancreas transplantation, small fiber repair can be detected within 6 months of pancreas transplantation using CCM. CCM is a novel noninvasive clinical technique to assess the benefits of therapeutic intervention in human diabetic neuropathy.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300) > Vision Science (111303)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300) > Optical Technology (111302)
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Health Research|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2007 American Diabetes Association|
|Deposited On:||20 Dec 2007|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:37|
Repository Staff Only: item control page