The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT)
Winzenberg, Tania M., Oldenburg, Brian F., Frendin, Sue, & Jones, Graeme (2003) The design of a valid and reliable questionnaire to measure osteoporosis knowledge in women: the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 4(17), pp. 1-7.
Background: Osteoporosis knowledge is an important contributor to improving exercise and
calcium intake behaviour. However, there are few validated instruments for measuring
osteoporosis knowledge levels. The aim of this study was to design a valid and reliable instrument
to measure osteoporosis knowledge in Australian women.
Methods: A 20 item instrument with true, false and don't know responses was drafted, based on
the Osteoporosis Australia Osteoporosis Prevention and Self-management course and the
information leaflet "Understanding Osteoporosis". The scoring range was 1 to 20. This was
administered to a 467 randomly-selected, healthy women aged 25–44 years. Questionnaire
performance was assessed by Flesch reading ease, index of difficulty, Ferguson's sigma, inter-item
and item-total correlations, Cronbach's alpha and principal component factor analysis.
Results: Flesch reading ease was higher than desirable at 45, but this was due to the use of the
word osteoporosis in many items. Of the individual items 17 had an index of difficulty less than 0.75.
The questionnaire had a Ferguson's sigma of 0.96, a Cronbach's alpha of 0.70 and factor analysis
consistent with only one factor (osteoporosis knowledge) being measured. Levels of osteoporosis
knowledge were low with a mean score of 8.8 out of 20 which suggests the OKAT may be sensitive
Conclusions: The OKAT for measuring osteoporosis knowledge has good psychometric
properties in Australian 25–44 year old females. While it should be applicable to other Caucasian
populations, this will require confirmation by further research.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||The contents of this journal can be freely accessed online via the journal’s web page (see hypertext link).|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health|
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2003 BioMed Central Ltd.|
|Copyright Statement:||Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.|
|Deposited On:||16 Jan 2008|
|Last Modified:||11 Aug 2011 04:22|
Repository Staff Only: item control page