Facing up to the Liabilities of Non-profit Enterprise: A Strategy to Minimise and Finance Liabilities
McGregor-Lowndes, Myles (1992) Facing up to the Liabilities of Non-profit Enterprise: A Strategy to Minimise and Finance Liabilities. [Working Paper]
This paper propsoes some reasons for the general discontent amongst nonprofit committee members and officers about their personal liability flowing from their voluntary positions. A practical strategy of risk management for nonprofit associations is outlines.
There appears to be an increasing air of gloom among nonprofit managers, staff and board members which is not due solely to Australia's early nineties economic downturn. The gloom concerns the potential personal legal liability of managers and board members as well as the nonprofit organisation. The fear is that legal action will be brought against persons not only in their capacity as office bearers representing a nonprofit organisation, but also in a personal capacity. This may result in the loss of personal assets, such as the family home, to satisfy a court-imposed liability. The National Safety Council case, where an individual director was sued successfully for more than $90 million, and several local personal injuries cases concerning nonprofit organisations have only reinforced these concerns. Anecdotal evidence has board members refusing to serve because of the risk of personal liability or demanding the purchase of expensive insurance policies. Staff are requiring professional indemnity insurance and boards are confused about their legal position. Many volunteers are trying to ignore the whole issue and believing that "it will only happen to others".
This paper proposes a range of possible causes for the concerns with liability that requires further investigation by empirical research. It is not the first time that such concern has been raised in Australia, nor is it confined to Australia. It has been an issue recently in both England and the United States. The responses to the issue of nonprofit organisational liability are then examined. One response which nonprofit organisations may find useful in dealing with the issue of liability is risk management. This strategy is discussed in some detail.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Working Paper|
|Additional Information:||For more information, please refer to the publisher's website (see hypertext link) or contact the author.|
|Keywords:||nonprofit, governance, liability, risk management, nonprofit organisations, nonprofit boards|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Law not elsewhere classified (180199)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (150300) > Business and Management not elsewhere classified (150399)
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 1992 QUT|
|Deposited On:||17 Jan 2008|
|Last Modified:||25 Sep 2013 22:39|
Repository Staff Only: item control page