An Alternative Polynomial Representation of the Wavefront Error Function
Iskander, D. Robert, Morelande, Mark R., Collins, Michael J., & Davis, Brett A. (2002) An Alternative Polynomial Representation of the Wavefront Error Function. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 43(12), p. 1898.
Purpose: Despite the good mathematical properties of Zernike polynomials, their fit to the wavefront error functions or height data from a videokeratoscope may not always be adequate. This occurs mainly because Zernike polynomials are global functions and are not suitable for characterizing local changes. A question arises whether a set of functions exists that would result in better modeling of the wavefront error function. Methods: We used our recently reported Bhatia-Wolf polynomial based method (IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng. Vol. 49, 2002, in press) as an alternative for modeling the wavefront error functions and compared it to the traditional Zernike polynomial based modeling. Results: The modeling error (RMS) of the Bhatia-Wolf polynomial based method is always smaller than that of the Zernike polynomials for a given radial order. For normal subjects it was observed that reduction in the modeling error was in the range of 30% to 50%. For subjects with significant aberrations (e.g. severe keratoconus), the decrease in the MSE was tenfold. Although some of the lower order terms of the Bhatia-Wolf polynomial expansion may not be directly recognized as a commonly known type of aberration, their use in fitting gives a significant improvement in wavefront estimation. We provide a physical explanation for these terms and introduce the concept of generalized defocus. Conclusion: The use of Bhatia-Wolf polynomial based modeling of the wavefront error function is a viable alternative to the Zernike polynomial representation. This is particularly important in areas such as customized refractive surgery, where the information from the Zernike polynomial fit may be directly used.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||For more information, please refer to the journal's website (see hypertext link) or contact the author.|
|Keywords:||364 computational modeling, 542 refraction, 500 optical properties|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300) > Vision Science (111303)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300) > Optical Technology (111302)
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Health Research|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2002 Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology|
|Deposited On:||21 Jan 2008|
|Last Modified:||22 Apr 2010 02:58|
Repository Staff Only: item control page