Reviewing Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology for the Creation of 'Saviour Siblings': Limits on the Basis of Genetic Disposition?
Smith, Malcolm K. (2007) Reviewing Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology for the Creation of 'Saviour Siblings': Limits on the Basis of Genetic Disposition? In The Australasian Bioethics Association and The Australian and New Zealand Institute of Health, Law and Ethics Joint Conference 2007. Health, Bioethics and the Law: Inclusions and Exclusions, 28 November to 1 December, 2007, Melbourne, Australia.
This is the latest version of this eprint.
The regulation of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Australia is a complicated mix of legislation, professional standards and guidelines. The legislation in Victoria, South Australia, and Western Australia, place limits on access to fertility services that do not exist in the non-statutory jurisdictions. Those who are clinically infertile or at risk of passing on a genetic disease or disorder if they were to naturally conceive are able to access services. However, it is arguable that the statutory eligibility criteria remain discriminatory in two ways despite the impact of previous court challenges. Firstly, it remains discriminatory to deny access to single and lesbian women unless they have been unable to conceive after having heterosexual intercourse over a required time frame.
The main focus of the paper however, relates to the second aspect of the statutory eligibility criteria, particularly in relation to the creation of saviour siblings. Some couples seek access to IVF services on the basis that they wish to have another child who would also be a tissue type match for an existing ill child. The use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis offers assistance in establishing tissue type prior to implantation of an embryo in the IVF cycle. However, under the current statutory eligibility criteria, a couple will only be granted access if they are themselves at risk of passing on a genetic disease or disorder. This means a couple who wish to use PGD solely to detect tissue type would not fall within the eligibility criteria. The lack of eligibility criteria in the non-statutory jurisdictions means that the technology is potentially available for detecting tissue compatibility regardless of whether the parents are themselves at risk of passing on a genetic disease. A distinction that is arguably irrelevant.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Conference Paper|
|Keywords:||Assisted Reproductive Technologies, ART, IVF, Saviour Siblings, Preimplantation genetic diagnosis, PGD|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Law not elsewhere classified (180199)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2007 (please consult author)|
|Deposited On:||06 Feb 2008|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2010 22:55|
Available Versions of this Item
- Reviewing Access to Assisted Reproductive Technology for the Creation of 'Saviour Siblings': Limits on the Basis of Genetic Disposition? (deposited 06 Feb 2008)[Currently Displayed]
Repository Staff Only: item control page