QUT ePrints

Reading with optical magnifiers: page navigation strategies and difficulties

Bowers, Alex R. , Cheong, Allen M.Y., & Lovie-Kitchin, Jan E. (2007) Reading with optical magnifiers: page navigation strategies and difficulties. Optometry And Vision Science, 84(1), pp. 9-20.

View at publisher

Abstract

PURPOSE: To read efficiently with a simple hand or stand magnifier, people with visual impairment have to move (navigate) the device along each line (forward phase) and back to the correct position at the start of the next line (retrace phase). Page navigation difficulties have been implicated as limiting factors when reading with hand and stand magnifiers, but have not been objectively measured. METHODS: Magnifier movements were recorded using a 3SPACE Isotrak system for 43 participants with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) who read two short stories using their habitual hand or stand magnifier. Page navigation was quantified in terms of magnifier movements and navigation errors for the forward and retrace phases. Visual acuities and visual fields were measured, and magnifier usage and page navigation difficulties were surveyed. RESULTS: During the forward phase, participants primarily used either a straight (47%) or diagonal downward (46%) movement, whereas during the retrace phase, the majority (56%) used a downward movement. On average, forward navigation time was four times longer than retrace navigation time (p<0.001). The most common navigation error was incorrect positioning of the magnifier at the end of the retrace movement. Near word acuity correlated strongly with forward time (r=0.78), and moderately with retrace time (r=0.53) and forward errors (r=0.50). Vertical field of view correlated with retrace errors (r=-0.53). Participants' estimates of page navigation difficulties were not predictive of objective measures of performance. CONCLUSIONS: We quantified page navigation strategies and difficulties of people with AMD reading with magnifiers. Retrace, which presents the most common difficulty, is not well predicted by vision measures or magnifier characteristics; future studies should investigate the relationship between motor skills and navigation performance, and the impact of training or devices on reducing retrace navigation difficulties.

Impact and interest:

9 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
7 citations in Web of Science®

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 12572
Item Type: Journal Article
Additional Information: The contents of this journal can be freely accessed online via the journal’s web page 12 months after publication.
Additional URLs:
Keywords: macular degeneration, reading, page navigation, magnifiers, OAVJ
ISSN: 1040-5488
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300) > Vision Science (111303)
Divisions: Current > Research Centres > Centre for Health Research
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Deposited On: 21 Feb 2008
Last Modified: 29 Feb 2012 23:37

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page