QUT ePrints

Patient-controlled analgesia versus conventional intramuscular injection: a cost effectiveness analysis

Chang, Anne M., Ip, Wan-Yim, & Cheung, T. H. (2004) Patient-controlled analgesia versus conventional intramuscular injection: a cost effectiveness analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 46(5), pp. 531-541.

Abstract

Background. In previous studies comparing patient-controlled-analgesia and intramuscular pain management have been unable to provide conclusive evidence of the benefits of either method of postoperative pain control.

Aim. The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of intravenous patient-controlled-analgesia with intermittent intramuscular morphine for Chinese women in the first 24 hours following elective gynaecological surgery.

Methods. A randomized control design was used. The main outcomes were level of pain and cost for the two types of pain management. Participants indicated their level of pain at rest and when deep breathing or coughing on a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, on seven occasions within 24 postoperative hours. Costs for the two types of pain management were based on the costs of equipment, drugs and nursing time.

Results. A total of 125 women participated in the study. Mean pain level over the 24 hours in the patient-controlled-analgesia group was significantly lower than in the intramuscular group (P < 0•001). Mean pain level over the seven occasions for the patient-controlled-analgesia group was 11•83 points (95% CI 7•1416•52) lower when at rest and 11•73 points (95% CI 5•9617•50) lower during motion than the intramuscular group. Cost per patient was $81•10 (Hong Kong) higher for patient-controlled-analgesia than for intramuscular pain management. Women in the patient-controlled-analgesia group had significantly greater satisfaction with pain management than those in the intramuscular group (P < 0•001), but reported significantly more episodes of nausea (P < 0•05).

Conclusions. While patient-controlled-analgesia was more costly, it was also more effective than conventional on-demand intramuscular opioid injections after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery.

Impact and interest:

22 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
14 citations in Web of Science®

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

3,249 since deposited on 18 May 2005
615 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 1337
Item Type: Journal Article
Additional URLs:
Keywords: pain, nursing, patient, controlled analgesia, intramuscular injection, cost, effectiveness, laparotomy, gynaecological surgery, Chinese
ISSN: 0309-2402
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > NURSING (111000) > Clinical Nursing - Secondary (Acute Care) (111003)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing
Copyright Statement: The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com
Deposited On: 18 May 2005
Last Modified: 29 Feb 2012 23:10

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page