Politics and Policy-making for Asia Literacy: The Rudd Report and a National Strategy in Australian Education

Henderson, Deborah J. (2008) Politics and Policy-making for Asia Literacy: The Rudd Report and a National Strategy in Australian Education. Asian Studies Review, 32(2), pp. 171-195.

[img] PDF (138kB)
Administrators only

View at publisher


This article traces the origins and policy processes of the first national attempt to establish the study of Asian languages and cultures in the Australian education system. Asian Languages and Australia's Economic Future (1994), referred to as the Rudd Report, after the Chair of the Working Group that produced it, was commissioned by the Council of Australian Governments (COAG) in December 1992 to develop a strategic framework for the implementation of an Asian languages and cultures program in Australian schools. The Report’s aetiology stemmed from a Languages other than English (LOTE) initiative of the Goss Government in Queensland and was presented to the first COAG meeting as a model for what might be achieved at the national level in Australia at a time when the federal Labor Government mounted a broader policy push for national capacity building and engagement with Asia. This intersection of interests achieved what a succession of policy documents since 1969 had been unable to attain - political agreement at federal and state levels in Australia - for a national policy prescription for Asian languages and studies. The Rudd Report marked a significant juncture for Australia as it emphasised that second language provision has domestic as well as external considerations and that both were linked to Australia's geopolitical future in the Asian region. This paper argues that the decision-making processes which produced the Report and its implementation as the National Asian Languages and Studies in Australian Schools (NALSAS) Strategy in 1995, can be analysed from the policy literature to cast light on the nature of cooperative federalism in Australia. It also argues that Rudd's role as the principal architect and key protagonist of the report drew on the ideology of economic rationalism and the role of the rational policy actor. Yet despite this policy achievement and signs that this long term strategy was taking effect, in 2002 the Howard Government cut the Commonwealth's funding commitment and undermined Australia's first experiment in prioritising Asian languages and cultures in the knowledge economy.

Impact and interest:

8 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 13854
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Additional Information: The author-version of this article will be available 18 months after publication.
For more information, please refer to the journal's website (see hypertext link) or contact the author.
Keywords: Asia literacy, Rudd report, national strategy, Asian languages and cultures, NALSAS strategy, Asian studies
DOI: 10.1080/10357820802064690
ISSN: 1467-8403
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY (160000) > POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION (160500) > Public Policy (160510)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > STUDIES IN HUMAN SOCIETY (160000) > POLITICAL SCIENCE (160600) > Australian Government and Politics (160601)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > EDUCATION (130000) > SPECIALIST STUDIES IN EDUCATION (130300)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LANGUAGES COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE (200000) > LANGUAGE STUDIES (200300) > Other Asian Languages (excl. South-East Asian) (200317)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > EDUCATION (130000) > CURRICULUM AND PEDAGOGY (130200) > Humanities and Social Sciences Curriculum and Pedagogy (excl. Economics Business and Management) (130205)
Divisions: Past > Research Centres > Office of Education Research
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2008 Taylor & Francis
Copyright Statement: This is an electronic version of an article published in [Asian Studies Review 32(2):pp. 171-195]. Asian Studies Review is available online at informaworldTM.
Deposited On: 24 Jun 2008 00:00
Last Modified: 29 Feb 2012 13:47

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page