QUT ePrints

Representational Deficiency of Process Modelling Languages: Measures and Implications

Indulska, Marta, Recker, Jan C., Rosemann, Michael, & Green, Peter (2008) Representational Deficiency of Process Modelling Languages: Measures and Implications. In Golden, W., Acton, T., Conboy, K., van der Heijden, H., & Tuunainen, V. (Eds.) 16th European Conference on Information Systems, June 9-11, 2008, Galway, Ireland.

Abstract

The large number of available process modelling languages has given rise to the need for evaluation and comparison of their representational capabilities. Over the last few years, the research community has risen to the challenge by carrying out a significant amount of work in the area of such analysis. Much of this effort is based on the Bunge-Wand-Weber representation model, a common benchmark used for the analysis of grammars that purport to model the real world and the interactions within it. However, the carried out BWW analyses of various process modelling languages exist largely separately from each other, with no comprehensive effort at the comparative measurement of their representational capability. This paper introduces four measures that, together, reflect the representational capacity and clarity of a process modelling language. These four measures are used in this paper to compare seven popular process modelling languages. The work provides insights into the representational deficiency similarities and differences between process modelling languages and also predicts some of their implications for practice.

Impact and interest:

0 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

252 since deposited on 02 Jul 2008
33 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 13948
Item Type: Conference Paper
Additional URLs:
ISBN: 9780955315923
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCES (080000) > INFORMATION SYSTEMS (080600) > Conceptual Modelling (080603)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Science and Technology
Current > Schools > School of Information Systems
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Science & Engineering Faculty
Current > Schools > School of Accountancy
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2008 (please consult author)
Deposited On: 02 Jul 2008
Last Modified: 14 Jul 2014 13:27

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page