Are Physical Capacity Constraints Relevant?: Applying Finance-Economics Theory to a Management Accounting Misconception
Gallagher, Lynn M. & Black, Terry (1999) Are Physical Capacity Constraints Relevant?: Applying Finance-Economics Theory to a Management Accounting Misconception. Australian Journal of Management, 24(2), pp. 143-158.
A view presented consistently in the management accounting literature is that firms usually operate at full capacity. Because firms are therefore subjected to physical capacity constraints, they frequently have to choose which of their profitable products to produce and in what quantities. The choice is made, according to the literature, by the application of a choice algorithm, and the application of this algorithm results in the loss of profitable sales.
A contrary view presented by finance-economics theory is that managers maximise the value of the firm by undertaking all profitable projects (production). With `profitable' defined in economic terms, finance-economics theory predicts that firms are subject to economic constraints which apply well before physical constraints become relevant. It predicts that in competitive markets, efficient production results in firms having spare capacity most of the time.
The paper is structured as follows. Sections 2 and 3 present the divergent claims relating to capacity issues from the management accounting and finance-economics literature respectively. A derivative issue, that of special order pricing, is also discussed in these sections. Section 4 applies well-established finance-economics principles to explain why the management accounting view on capacity constraints is a misconception. Since the two views are diametrically opposed, only one can be an accurate descriptor of the real world. Ultimately the differences can only be resolved empirically. Section 5 reports the results of a survey of Australian manufacturing firms. Conclusions are drawn in section 6.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||The contents of this journal can be freely accessed online via the journal's web page (see hypertext link).|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND ACCOUNTABILITY (150100)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School|
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 1999 The Australian Graduate School of Management|
|Deposited On:||28 Jul 2008|
|Last Modified:||05 Jan 2011 23:37|
Repository Staff Only: item control page