Legal Representation in Australia Before Tribunals, Committees and Other Bodies

Latimer, Paul, Hocken, Michael A., & Marsden, Stephen J. (2007) Legal Representation in Australia Before Tribunals, Committees and Other Bodies. ELaw Journal: Murdoch University Electronic Journal of Law, 14(2), pp. 122-141.

View at publisher (open access)


The enormous increase in the volume and complexity of litigation throughout Australia was undoubtedly the driving force behind the States and Federal Parliament's reasoning for creating tribunals. Statutory bodies may be established to investigate and inquire (hold hearings) into matters arising under legislation. Committees may be set up under legislation, workplace agreements etc to investigate and make recommendations on various matters such as expelling a student from school or university. Specialist (domestic) tribunals are created to ease the burden and case load on the Courts without compromising the quality of justice. Some tribunals, such as the Small Claims Tribunal, are de facto courts and some deal with matters like town planning and licensing with the aim of "taking the politics out of politics".1 In this article, we use "tribunal" to refer to statutory bodies, committees and domestic tribunals unless stated otherwise. Although tribunals have the advantage of using specific expertise, not all legal issues can be resolved by reference to the provisions of the legislation establishing these particular tribunals. Determining whether parties before a tribunal should be entitled to representation by a lawyer (legal representation) is one of these issues. This issue can be complicated further by legislation such as section 76(1)(a) of the Commercial and Consumer Tribunal Act 2003 (Qld) which prohibits representation by a lawyer in some situations:

Impact and interest:

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

3,057 since deposited on 28 Jul 2008
333 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 14183
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: No
Additional Information: The contents of this journal can be freely accessed online via the journal’s web page (see hypertext link).
ISSN: 1321-8247
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2007 School of Law, Murdoch University
Deposited On: 28 Jul 2008 00:00
Last Modified: 08 Jul 2014 01:23

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page