Leveraging engineering asset data : strategic priorities, data types and informational outcomes
Murphy, Glen D., Chang, Artemis, & Barlow, M. (2008) Leveraging engineering asset data : strategic priorities, data types and informational outcomes. In Jinji, Goa, Lee, Jay, Ni, Jun, Ma, Lin, & Mathew, Joseph (Eds.) 3rd World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and Intelligent Maintenance Systems Conference (WCEAM-IMS 2008): Engineering Asset Management – A Foundation for Sustainable Development, 27–30 October 2008, Beijing, China.
A common complaint heard within the engineering asset community is that while the capacity for data storage increases, the quality of ever increasing amounts of data remains poor. We propose a new model of engineering asset data management that helps explain why data collected by organizations frequently fails to assist in effective engineering asset management. The model situates a four component typology of engineering
data between institutional drivers (e.g. organizational culture; organizational strategy; organizational life-cycle; consequence of asset failure) and asset management outcomes. We argue these outcomes (regulatory compliance; time-based maintenance; condition-based asset management; capacity development) are functions
not only of the data collected by an organization, but its capacity to leverage that data. We develop a model suggesting that institutional drivers dictate the data requirements of engineering asset intensive firms, typically
at the cost of data requirements for different phases in the asset's life-cycle. This paper will assist practitioners to re-conceptualize the manner in which they view their data, the manner in which it is utilized, and provide a better understanding of data and its intended outcomes. This will allow a better prioritization of data collection
activities and offer an improved insight into ways in which engineering data may be better transformed into informational and knowledge outcomes.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Conference Paper|
|Keywords:||Data Quality, Organisational Lifecycle, Data Typology|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (150300) > Organisational Planning and Management (150312)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (150300) > Innovation and Technology Management (150307)
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Business Research|
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Current > Research Centres > CRC Integrated Engineering Asset Management (CIEAM)
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2008 Springer|
|Copyright Statement:||This is the author-version of the work. Conference proceedings published, by Springer Verlag, will be available via SpringerLink. http://www.springerlink.com SpringerLink|
|Deposited On:||13 Nov 2008|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:43|
Repository Staff Only: item control page