Biomechanics of Dysfunction and Injury Management for the Cervical Spine

Sim, Darryl Frederick (2004) Biomechanics of Dysfunction and Injury Management for the Cervical Spine. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology.


The research described in this thesis focuses on the biomechanics of cervical spine injury diagnosis and rehabilitation management. This research is particularly relevant to the diagnosis of minor neck injuries that typically arise from motor vehicle accidents and are classified as "whiplash injuries". The diagnosis and treatment of these chronic neck problems has been particularly difficult and frustrating and these difficulties prompted calls for the objective evaluation of the techniques and procedures used in the measurement and assessment of neck dysfunction. The biomechanical aspects of the clinical diagnosis of minor cervical spine injuries were investigated in this work by reconfiguring an existing detailed biomechanical model of the human neck to simulate injuries to particular structures, and to model abnormal muscle activation. The investigation focused on the range of motion assessment and the methods of testing and rehabilitating the function of the deep neck muscles because the model could be applied to provide further insight into these facets of neck injury diagnosis and management.

The de Jager detailed head-neck model, available as a research tool from TNO (The Netherlands), was chosen for this study because it incorporated sufficient anatomical detail, but the model required adaptation because it had been developed for impact and crash test dummy simulations. This adaptation significantly broadened the model's field of application to encompass the clinical domain.

The facets of the clinical diagnosis of neck dysfunction investigated in this research were range of motion and deep muscle control testing. Range of motion testing was simulated by applying a force to the head to generate the primary motions of flexion/extension, lateral flexion and axial twisting and parametric changes were made to particular structures to determine the effect on the head-neck movement. The main finding from this study of cervical range of motion testing was that while motion can be accurately measured in three dimensions, consideration of the three dimensional nature of the motion can add little to the clinical diagnosis of neck dysfunctions. Given the non-discriminatory nature of range of motion testing, the scientific collection and interpretation of the three dimensional motion patterns cannot be justified clinically.

The de Jager head-neck model was then further adapted to model the cranio-cervical flexion test, which is used clinically to test the function of the deep muscle groups of the neck. This simulation provided confirmation of the efficacy of using a pressure bio-feedback unit to provide visual indication of the activation of the deep flexor muscles in the neck. However, investigation of the properties of the pressure bio-feedback unit identified significant differences in the stiffness of the bag for the different levels of inflation that must be accounted for if comparisons are to be made between subjects.

Following the identification of the calibration anomalies associated with the pressure bio-feedback unit, the motion of the point of pressure of the head on the headrest and the force at this point of contact during the activation of the deep flexor muscle group were investigated as an alternative source of feedback. This output, however, was found to be subject specific, depending on the posterior shape of the skull that determined the point of contact during the head rolling action. Clinically, an important outcome of the alternative feedback assessment was that the prescribed action to target the deep flexor muscle group will feel different for each individual, ranging from a slide to a roll of the head on the headrest, and this must be accounted for when explaining the action and during rehabilitation management.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

2,345 since deposited on 03 Dec 2008
145 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 15852
Item Type: QUT Thesis (PhD)
Supervisor: Barker, Timothy, Evans, John, & Pearcy, Mark
Keywords: Biomechanics, cervical spine, diagnosis, injury, modelling, physiotherapy, pressure bio-feedback, range of motion, rehabilitation, whiplash
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering
Department: Built Environment and Engineering
Institution: Queensland University of Technology
Copyright Owner: Copyright Darryl Frederick Sim
Deposited On: 03 Dec 2008 03:51
Last Modified: 25 Jun 2017 14:39

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page