The derivative imperative : how should Australian criminal trial courts treat evidence deriving from illegally or improperly obtained evidence?
Mellifont, Kerri Anne (2007) The derivative imperative : how should Australian criminal trial courts treat evidence deriving from illegally or improperly obtained evidence? Professional Doctorate thesis, Queensland University of Technology.
How should Australian criminal trial courts treat evidence deriving from illegally or improperly obtained evidence? The fact that derivative evidence gives rise to factors distinct from primary evidence makes it deserving of an examination of its peculiarities. In doing so, the assumption may be put aside that derivative evidence falls wholly within the established general discourse of illegally or improperly obtained evidence. Just as the judicial response to primary evidence must be intellectually rigorous, disciplined and principled, so must be the response to derivative evidence. As such, a principled analysis of how Australian courts should approach derivative evidence can significantly contribute to the discourse on the law with respect to the exclusion of illegally or improperly obtained evidence. This thesis provides that principled analysis by arguing that the principles which underpin and inform the discretionary exclusionary frameworks within Australia require an approach which is consistent as between illegally obtained derivative evidence and illegally obtained primary evidence.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||QUT Thesis (Professional Doctorate)|
|Supervisor:||Mackenzie, Geraldine, Harris, Wendy, & Sibley, Robert|
|Keywords:||evidence-illegally, unfairly or improperly obtained evidence, criminal procedure, exclusion of evidence, real evidence, confessions, judicial discretion to exclude evidence, primary evidence, derivative evidence|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Department:||Faculty of Law|
|Institution:||Queensland University of Technology|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright Kerri Anne Mellifont|
|Deposited On:||03 Dec 2008 14:02|
|Last Modified:||29 Oct 2011 05:47|
Repository Staff Only: item control page