QUT ePrints

The Impact of Expert Testimony on Jurors’ Decisions: Gender of the Expert and Testimony Complexity

Schuller, Regina A., Terry, Deborah J., & McKimmie, Blake M. (2005) The Impact of Expert Testimony on Jurors’ Decisions: Gender of the Expert and Testimony Complexity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35(6), pp. 1266-1280.

View at publisher

Abstract

The present study investigated whether people used the gender of an expert witness as a heuristic cue to evaluate the evidence presented by the expert. Specifically, the gender of the expert, as well as the complexity of the expert’s testimony (low, high), were systematically varied within a simulated civil trial involving an antitrust price fixing agreement. It was expected that the male expert would be more persuasive than the female expert, but only when the testimony presented was complex. As predicted, this interaction was revealed across a range of the dependent measures. Somewhat unexpected was the finding of a female expert advantage in the low complexity condition. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Impact and interest:

13 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™
10 citations in Web of Science®

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 1639
Item Type: Journal Article
Additional Information: For more information, please refer to the journal's website (see hypertext link) or contact the author.
Keywords: expert testimony, expert witnesses, language complexity, mode of information processing, stereotypes, schemas, jurors, gender
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02170.x
ISSN: 0021-9029
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > LAW (180100) > Law not elsewhere classified (180199)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES (170000) > PSYCHOLOGY (170100) > Social and Community Psychology (170113)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2005 Blackwell Publishing
Copyright Statement: The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com
Deposited On: 11 Oct 2005
Last Modified: 11 Aug 2011 03:49

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page