Characterising heavy vehicle suspensions – impulse testing results and analysis
One response to requests from the transport industry to allow more “freight efficient” heavy vehicles (HVs) onto the road network has been that road authorities have allowed higher axle loads in return for HVs being equipped with “road-friendly” suspensions. These suspensions (particularly those with air springs) are critically dependant on shock absorber health for proper operation. They are only certified, however, as “road-friendly” at the time of manufacture and this via a type-test. Once in service, the “road-friendliness” is determined solely by the maintenance regime of the transport operator. There is no in-service test for HV suspensions in Australia yet. Over 50% of HVs do not meet at least one of the criteria for Australian requirements of “road-friendly” suspensions (Blanksby, George, Germanchev, Patrick, & Marsh, 2006). The Australian Government and the States of New South Wales and Queensland are funding a programme to develop an in-service suspension test for HVs (Australia Department of Transport and Regional Services, 2005a, 2005b). This report examines some possible low-cost test methodologies for an in-service HV suspension test and their results within the context of a “proof-of-concept” test programme. The results show that low-cost testing is possible and is comparable in accuracy to the high-cost methods used for the original “road-friendly” certification.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
Repository Staff Only: item control page