The edge of palliative care : certainty, but at what price?
Section 282A is a relatively short section purporting to do little more than statutorily enshrine an existing common law doctrine to remove doubt and promote certainty. However, the provision goes well beyond confirming the existing law and creates an excuse that is significantly more stringent than the doctrine of double effect. Overall, the reform is a positive one in that it provides greater legal certainty for health care professionals and patients. Concerns about being prosecuted because the law was not clear have been met. However, this certainty comes at a price because s282A also requires greater competence and documentation of those administering palliative care. Health care professionals making dying patients as comfortable as possible must now ensure that the care provided to achieve this is appropriately documented and reasonable in the context of good medical practice.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||End of life decision-making, Doctrine of double effect, Palliative care|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (180000) > OTHER LAW AND LEGAL STUDIES (189900)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law
Current > Research Centres > Australian Centre for Health Law Research
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2004 School of Law, Flinders University|
|Deposited On:||17 Dec 2008 02:48|
|Last Modified:||04 Feb 2015 01:31|
Repository Staff Only: item control page