Balancing academic advancement with business effectiveness? The dual role for senior university leaders
Drew, Glenys M. (2006) Balancing academic advancement with business effectiveness? The dual role for senior university leaders. International Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Change Management, 6(4), pp. 117-125.
Competing pressures have served to make universities increasingly complex organisations. Universities worldwide have been required to rely less on a “knowledge for knowledge’s sake” ethos to embrace a more “applied” or “user led” focus in an environment of mass education, decreased government funding and greater reliance upon collaboration with industry for funding of research and development. Concomitantly increasing administrative reporting and accreditation requirements see universities globally caught between the worlds of “Academe” and “business”. The question is how do universities build and maintain academic rigour while managing increasing internal and external accountabilities? How will the institution span its different “worlds” in the “unknown future” of the 21st century? Moreover, how are prepared are universities and education/knowledge organisations for the unprecedented age-related attrition which might be anticipated over the next five to ten years? This paper reviews literature and some evidence from the practice relating to management and leadership in university and knowledge environments. It scans external factors which might influence succession planning in leadership at a time when building leadership strength and safeguarding knowledge appears to be vital. The paper notes researched trends from data on perceptions of the practice of leading and managing in university and education/knowledge organisations and suggests some ways to harness organisational complexity positively to plan for a buoyant future.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||The contents of this journal can be freely accessed online via the journal’s web page (see hypertext link).|
|Keywords:||Universities, Academic, Succession Leadership, Feedback, HERN|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 (this paper), the author
Copyright 2006 (selection and editorial matter) Common Ground
CGPublisher has provides the electronic version of this work to you without any form of encryption. In return for this convenience, we ask you to respect the copyright of the creator(s). In the case of the electronic version of this work, you may:
Keep one copy of the file on your computer or a removable storage medium.
Make a copy of the file, other than for the purpose of computer backup or moving it from one location or storage medium to another.
|Deposited On:||07 Jan 2009 00:59|
|Last Modified:||27 Oct 2014 04:57|
Repository Staff Only: item control page