Predictors of driving assessment outcome in Parkinson's Disease
This study evaluated selected clinical and functional tests as predictors of driving safety outcomes in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients. Twenty five PD patients and 21 age-matched controls, all regular drivers, underwent neurological evaluation and assessment of cognitive, visual and motor function and a standardised, on-road driving assessment. The capacity of the tests to predict pass/fail driving outcomes was determined by selecting a sub-set with the highest predictive value from each domain and then subjecting these to discriminant function analysis. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were determined. Three relatively simple tests from the larger battery predicted passes with relatively high sensitivity (PD: 72.7%, controls: 93.8%, both combined: 85.2%); and moderate specificity (PD: 64.3%, controls: 60.0%, both combined: 63.2%). These tests assessed motor performance (Purdue Pegboard test), contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson test) and cognitive function (verbal version of Symbol Digit Modalities Test). Adding time since diagnosis for the PD group increased sensitivity to 90.9% and specificity to 71.4 %. These simple tests confer more objectivity and predictive power to clinical recommendations for driving, they reflect distinct functions that are necessary for safe driving, and may be especially useful when on-road assessments are not feasible.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
Repository Staff Only: item control page