The problem of legitimacy in mediation
Field, Rachael M. (2008) The problem of legitimacy in mediation. Contemporary Issues in Law, 9(1), pp. 48-60.
|Published Version (PDF 2MB) |
Access restricted – pending publisher permission.
Administrators only | Request a copy from author
Mediation is becoming more and more prominent as a mode of legal dispute resolution. In commercial contexts, mediation is widely viewed as an efficient and expedient way of resolving disputes without recourse to formal legal processes. In other contexts, too, mediation is widely viewed as the dispute resolution process of first resort. This conception of mediation as an alternative to the legal process is increasingly being enshrined in legislation. In Australia, for example, attendance at family mediation is now effectively a compulsory pre-filing requirement in family matters concerning children. This article seeks to draw attention to a fundamental theoretical problem raised by the increasing reliance on mediation as an alternative way of resolving legal disputes. Let us call it the problem of legitimacy in mediation. The problem is perhaps best exposed by way of a comparison with mainstream legal procedures. There is a long running debate in legal and political philosophy about the legitimacy of law as a means of settling social disputes. Law claims authority to provide a final resolution of such disputes. However, philosophers have long debated whether this claim to authority is justified.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||Access to the author-version is currently restricted pending permission from the publisher. For more information, please refer to the journal’s website (see hypertext link) or contact the author.|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2008 Lawtext Publishing|
|Deposited On:||19 Feb 2009 09:22|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:45|
Repository Staff Only: item control page