What happens to ‘Big Ideas’ at the front line of human services : the case of service user rights
Crane, Philip R. (2003) What happens to ‘Big Ideas’ at the front line of human services : the case of service user rights. PhD thesis, University of Queensland.
This thesis examines how policy promoted as benefiting the users of human services can fail if it does not appreciate the front-line contexts its implementation depends on. The specific concern is how front-line practitioners in non-profit human services understood and responded to the application of service user rights policies to their practice settings. The study begins with the Hawke–Keating period of government, and ends in the late 1990s. During the Hawke–Keating period service user rights policies were explicitly incorporated into a range of Commonwealth human service programs as one manifestation of the new program management (NPM) approach to accountability and control. Four Australian human service programs were sampled: the Supported Accommodation Assistance Program (SAAP), the Home and Community Care Program (HACC), Adolescent Mediation and Family Therapy services (AMFT), and the Youth Homeless Pilot Programme (YHPP). Services from each program in Melbourne, Wollongong, Darwin and the Gold Coast were studied. Forwards and backwards mapping were used to examine the nexus between policy as intended, and policy as understood by those undertaking direct service delivery with young people. The place ‘rights-talk’ had in the practice framework of these front-line practitioners was examined and compared with the espoused policy positions of the programs and the funded services they worked within. The various factors conditioning the workers’ approach to the service user rights aspects of practice were identified. The thesis concludes that front-line human service workers, whose practice is highly contextualised, thwart human service program design unless this design reflects the model of service delivery. Front-line bureaucracy theory was found to apply. The study details the tension between the various contexts of front-line practice and the service user rights policy framework. The level of connection with people and social institutions in the life situation of the young service user, combined with the extent to which the mandated model of service delivery was flexible or prescribed, were found to influence front-line practitioners’ approach to service user rights.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Thesis (PhD)|
|Keywords:||consumer rights, front-line bureaucracy, user rights, de-institutionalisation, human service practice|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Past > Schools > Social Work & Human Services
|Institution:||University of Queensland|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2003 [please consult the author]|
|Deposited On:||27 Feb 2009 04:37|
|Last Modified:||16 Jan 2017 02:10|
Repository Staff Only: item control page