Rating access to health care : are there differences according to geographical region?
Hausdorf, Katrin, Rogers, Carla M., Whiteman, David C., Newman, Beth M., Coxeter, Peter D., Youl, Philippa H., & Aitken, Joanne F. (2008) Rating access to health care : are there differences according to geographical region? Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 32(3), pp. 246-249.
Objective: To report on satisfaction with access to health care in Queensland focussing on regional differences.-----
Methods: A sub-sample of 4440 respondents with no history of cancer from the Queensland Cancer Risk Study who completed a self-administered questionnaire was used for this study.-----
Main outcome measures: Perceptions of overall difficulty gaining access to health care and ratings of access to various health care services by region.-----
Results: Queenslanders living outside major cities reported less satisfaction with access to various aspects of health care services. Age was associated with more favourable ratings of health care access.-----
Conclusions: Despite public health efforts to increase service provision throughout Queensland, health care access is still rated relatively less favourably by Queenslanders in regional and remote parts of the state.-----
Implications: Identifying which services are difficult to access and why will assist public health policy makers in improving health service accessibility.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Repository Staff Only: item control page