Is indefeasibility of title a bar to restitution after reversal of a judgment on appeal?
The majority judgment of the Queensland Court of Appeal in White v Tomasel1 raises serious, and to this point unlitigated, issues concerning the application of the in personam exception to a claim for restitution of title after the reversal of a judgment on appeal. This article respectfully ventures to suggest that the majority of the Court have erred in suggesting that the otherwise indefeasible title of a buyer, registered pursuant to a court order, set aside on appeal, can be disturbed and, that the minority member of the Court was correct in holding that the right to restitution of the title to registered land in those circumstances did not fit within the in personam exception to indefeasibility.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2005 LexisNexis Butterworths|
|Deposited On:||13 Mar 2009 06:58|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 13:15|
Repository Staff Only: item control page