Spousal competence and compellability in criminal trials in the 21st century
Harris, Wendy E. (2003) Spousal competence and compellability in criminal trials in the 21st century. QUT Law and Justice Journal, 3(2).
For many centuries a lawfully married spouse of an accused occupied a privileged position in terms of giving evidence against his or her spouse in criminal trials. This paper examines the historical origins and rationales for the special spousal rules relating to competence, compellability and privilege. The paper analyses the continued relevance of these rationales to adult relationships in the 21st century with particular emphasis on the application of these rules to former spouses, de facto spouses, same sex relationships and traditional aboriginal marriages. The approaches taken in the various jurisdictions in Australia are discussed to determine the adoption of the rationales in the relevant legislation and the extent of application outside lawful marriages. The analysis reveals a divergence across Australia as to both approach and the categories of witnesses given special treatment under the competency and compellability rules.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Deposited On:||17 Mar 2009 04:07|
|Last Modified:||17 Mar 2009 04:07|
Repository Staff Only: item control page