Breaching the right to social security
Walsh, Tamara (2003) Breaching the right to social security. Griffith Law Review, 12(1), pp. 43-63.
Under Australia's current social security breach penalty regime, harsh monetary penalties are imposed on income support recipients who commit (often very minor) breaches of their mutual obligation requirements. The current regime offends a number of provisions of international human rights law, including the rights to social security, an adequate standard of living, free choice of employment and rest and leisure. In addition, the regime contravenes certain provisions in the Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) and offends established rules of natural justice required under administrative law. Further, the penalty regime breaches a number of established principles of common law, including freedom of contract, the presumption of innocence and the principle that the best interests of the child should be considered paramount in decisions affecting children. The recently passed AWT Act 2003 (Cth) will go some way towards rectifying some of these contraventions; however, further reforms will be required before it can be said that the government's breach penalty regime does not amount to a breach of the law.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Deposited On:||18 Mar 2009 05:20|
|Last Modified:||18 Mar 2009 05:20|
Repository Staff Only: item control page