Has the high court crippled the effectiveness of S46 of the trade practices act?
Corones, Stephen G. (2004) Has the high court crippled the effectiveness of S46 of the trade practices act? Australian Business Law Review, 32(2), pp. 142-148.
|Published Version (PDF 104kB) |
Administrators only | Request a copy from author
This article considers the High Court’s decision in Rural Press Ltd v ACCC  HCA 75 (11 December 2003. This is the third recent case in which it has been required to construe and apply s 46 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) (the Act). (The other two recent cases are Melway Publishing Pty Ltd v Robert Hicks Pty Ltd (2001) 205 CLR 1 (Melway) and Boral Besser Masonry Ltd v ACCC (2003) 195 ALR 609 (Boral). Prior to these decisions the leading authority on the interpretation and application of s 46 was Queensland Wire Industries Pty Ltd v Broken Hill Pty Co Ltd (1989) 167 CLR 177 (Queensland Wire).)
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Trade Practices, Misuse of market power, Competition, Rural Press|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
Current > Research Centres > Law and Justice Research Centre
Current > Schools > School of Law
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2004 Lawbook Company Limited|
|Deposited On:||26 Mar 2009 08:46|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:06|
Repository Staff Only: item control page