Upper-arm anthropometry : an alternative indicator of nutritional health to Body Mass Index in unilateral lower-extremity amputees?
Miller, Michelle, Wong, Wing Ki, Wu, Jing, Cavenett, Sally, Daniels, Lynne, & Crotty, Maria (2008) Upper-arm anthropometry : an alternative indicator of nutritional health to Body Mass Index in unilateral lower-extremity amputees? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(10), pp. 2031-2033.
Objective: To evaluate the utility of body mass index (BMI) and corrected-arm-muscle area (CAMA) as measures of nutritional health for lower-limb amputees attending prosthetics clinics.--- Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Prosthetics clinic in Australia. Participants: Unilateral lower-extremity amputees (N58; age range, 21–91y; 37 transtibial, 21 transfemoral) attending a regional prosthetics clinic between May and November 2003. Interventions: Not applicable.--- Main Outcome Measures: Weight (without prosthesis), corrected and uncorrected for the amputated limb was used with height estimated from knee height to calculate corrected BMI (cBMI) and uncorrected BMI (uBMI). CAMA was calculated using the mean of triplicate mid-upper-arm circumference (MUAC) and triceps skinfold thickness (TST) measurements. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and Assessment of Quality of Life were administered according to recommended protocols. The Pearson correlation was used to determine the strength and significance of associations between variables, and bivariate regression analyses were performed to determine whether an association existed between the nutritional variables (BMI, CAMA, MNA) and quality of life (QOL).--- Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the measures of nutritional health according to site (transtibial, transfemoral) of amputation. MUAC, TST, and CAMA all showed moderate to high positive correlations (r range, .541.782) with both cBMI and uBMI. The strength of the relationship between the MNA and cBMI/uBMI was weaker (r.383, r.380, respectively) but remained positive and statistically significant (P.003). QOL was not associated with cBMI or uBMI but was related to CAMA (.132; P.030) and MNA (.561; P.017).
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Disabled persons, Nutritional status, Obesity, Quality of life, Rehabilitation|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > NUTRITION AND DIETETICS (111100) > Clinical and Sports Nutrition (111101)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Public Health & Social Work
|Deposited On:||17 Apr 2009 03:14|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 13:49|
Repository Staff Only: item control page