Upper-arm anthropometry : an alternative indicator of nutritional health to Body Mass Index in unilateral lower-extremity amputees?
Miller, Michelle, Wong, Wing Ki, Wu, Jing, Cavenett, Sally, Daniels, Lynne, & Crotty, Maria (2008) Upper-arm anthropometry : an alternative indicator of nutritional health to Body Mass Index in unilateral lower-extremity amputees? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(10), pp. 2031-2033.
Objective: To evaluate the utility of body mass index (BMI)
and corrected-arm-muscle area (CAMA) as measures of nutritional
health for lower-limb amputees attending prosthetics
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Prosthetics clinic in Australia.
Participants: Unilateral lower-extremity amputees (N58;
age range, 21–91y; 37 transtibial, 21 transfemoral) attending a
regional prosthetics clinic between May and November 2003.
Interventions: Not applicable.---
Main Outcome Measures: Weight (without prosthesis),
corrected and uncorrected for the amputated limb was used
with height estimated from knee height to calculate corrected
BMI (cBMI) and uncorrected BMI (uBMI). CAMA was calculated
using the mean of triplicate mid-upper-arm circumference
(MUAC) and triceps skinfold thickness (TST) measurements.
The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) and
Assessment of Quality of Life were administered according to
recommended protocols. The Pearson correlation was used to
determine the strength and significance of associations between
variables, and bivariate regression analyses were performed to
determine whether an association existed between the nutritional
variables (BMI, CAMA, MNA) and quality of life
Results: There were no statistically significant differences in
the measures of nutritional health according to site (transtibial,
transfemoral) of amputation. MUAC, TST, and CAMA all
showed moderate to high positive correlations (r range,
.541.782) with both cBMI and uBMI. The strength of the
relationship between the MNA and cBMI/uBMI was weaker
(r.383, r.380, respectively) but remained positive and statistically
significant (P.003). QOL was not associated with
cBMI or uBMI but was related to CAMA (.132; P.030)
and MNA (.561; P.017).
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Disabled persons, Nutritional status, Obesity, Quality of life, Rehabilitation|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > NUTRITION AND DIETETICS (111100) > Clinical and Sports Nutrition (111101)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health|
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Public Health & Social Work
|Deposited On:||17 Apr 2009 13:14|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:49|
Repository Staff Only: item control page