Ownership as the proximity or privity principle in unjust enrichmentlaw
Fitzgerald, Brian F. (1995) Ownership as the proximity or privity principle in unjust enrichmentlaw. University of Queensland Law Journal, 18(2), pp. 166-182.
This article examines the rationale for unjust enrichment law and considers the theory of Samuel Stoljar. It examines how the Stoljar poperty theaory might be better undertsood and how it might fit with the approach to unjust enrichment espoused by Professor Peter Birks. The article considers the notion and role of "ownership" in unjust enrichment law.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Stoljar property theory, Unjust enrichment, Ownership and unjust enrichment, Restitution, Unjust enrichment and conversion, Touchstone of unjust enrichment, Reconciling Birks and Stoljar theory of unjust enrichment|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Law|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 1995 Brian Fitzgerald|
|Deposited On:||20 Apr 2009 07:27|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2010 23:35|
Repository Staff Only: item control page