The EvaluateIT Kit: A Method for Engaging Communities in Evaluating IT Projects
Lennie, June, Hearn, Gregory N., & Hanrahan, Mary U. (2005) The EvaluateIT Kit: A Method for Engaging Communities in Evaluating IT Projects. In International Conference on Engaging Communities, 14-17 August 2005, Brisbane, Australia. (Unpublished)
All community development projects that involve communication and information technologies (C&IT) rely on interactive participation with community members and stakeholders. Participation in design, content development, literacy building and training are all important. When it comes to evaluating the impacts and effectiveness of community IT projects, participation is equally important. So how can community IT projects be evaluated in an inclusive and participatory way? This paper outlines how this can be achieved using an online resource kit developed by Queensland University of Technology and its industry partners - www.evaluateit.org. The EvaluateIT kit is one of the results of three years of intensive research with two rural communities who were developing projects such as community websites to enhance their communities and improve communication and learning. In this paper we:
• Discuss the value of participatory action research and participatory evaluation in evaluating community projects.
• Describe the process involved in designing and developing the EvaluateIT kit.
• Summarise results of questionnaires and focus group discussions on the kit with rural and regional participants.
• Present a detailed case study of how a community group successfully used the EvaluateIT process to improve a rural library website.
• Suggest other uses and applications of the kit.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
Repository Staff Only: item control page