Evaluating the system intelligence of the intelligent building systems : Part 2 : construction and validation of analytical models
Wong, Johnny, Li, Heng, & Lai, Jenkin (2008) Evaluating the system intelligence of the intelligent building systems : Part 2 : construction and validation of analytical models. Automation in Construction, 17(3), pp. 303-321.
This paper describes the development of an analytical model for computing the system intelligence score (SIS) of key building control systems in the intelligent building. The models presented in this paper applied the system intelligence theory, and the conceptual analytical framework developed in Part 1 [J.K.W. Wong, H. Li, J. Lai, Evaluating the system intelligence of the intelligent building systems -- Part 1: Development of key intelligent indicators and assessment approaches, (submitted and under review)]. Two multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and analytic network process (ANP), were employed in this study to evaluate the system intelligence of the intelligent building systems. AHP was utilized to determine the relative importance of the intelligent attributes and indicators in the model, while the ANP supermatrix was employed to examine the interdependence between the intelligent attributes and the operational benefits of the intelligent building system. A comparison of findings obtained from AHP and ANP approaches indicated that most of the values of the intelligent indicators changed. The interdependence between operational goals/benefits and the intelligent attributes modified the original ratings obtained from AHP. The ANP approach allows inclusive decision making on the system intelligence. Such approach not only examines the intelligent properties of intelligent building systems, but also considers the operational benefits brought by intelligent technologies. The paper uses the integrated building management system (IBMS) as an illustrative example to present a framework. The proposed analytical model is illustrated with an example to demonstrate its assessment procedures and test its effectiveness in application.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||System intelligence score (SIS), Intelligent building system (IBS), Analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Analytic network process (ANP), Intelligent indicators (IIs)|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200) > Building not elsewhere classified (120299)|
|Divisions:||Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering|
Past > Schools > School of Urban Development
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2008 Elsevier|
|Deposited On:||25 Oct 2010 09:49|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:41|
Repository Staff Only: item control page