Evaluation of surveillance methods for an epidemiological study of contact lens related microbial keratitis
Keay, Lisa, Edwards, Katie P., Brian, Garry, Naduvilath, Thomas, & Stapleton, Fiona (2004) Evaluation of surveillance methods for an epidemiological study of contact lens related microbial keratitis. Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology, 32(4), pp. 349-353.
PURPOSE: To evaluate surveillance methods in a pilot epidemiological study of contact lens related microbial keratitis (MK) cases identified by ophthalmic practitioners in Australia and New Zealand between May and August 2003 inclusive.----- METHODS: Twelve ophthalmologists and 55 optometrists from rural and metropolitan locations were sent a study information pack with postal reporting forms. After 2 months, practitioners were emailed a link to a website for Internet reporting. After 4 months, practitioners were prompted by email and then by telephone if a response was not received. Passive response rates were the rate of returns after posting information and emailing the website link. Active response rates included personalized email and telephone follow-up.----- RESULTS: Ten cases of MK were identified by optometrists and five by ophthalmologists. The passive response rates were 79% and 58% for the first and second reporting periods, respectively. There was a lower response rate in the second reporting period compared to the first (P = 0.02). With active surveillance the response rate increased to 97% and 96%. A large proportion of optometrists (62%) and ophthalmologists (55%) used the website for at least one reporting period. Internet reporting was used by all New Zealand practitioners (5/5).----- CONCLUSIONS: A surveillance study to estimate the incidence of contact lens related MK in Australia and New Zealand is feasible and acceptable. Internet-based reporting offers a reliable, rapid and cost-effective means of running a large scale, international surveillance study. Active surveillance methods are necessary to enhance reporting rates.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Additional Information:||Accession Number: 15281965 Language: English. Date Revised: 20061115. Date Created: 20040729. Date Completed: 20041018. Update Code: 20081217. Publication Type: Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't. Journal ID: 100896531. Publication Model: Print. Cited Medium: Print. NLM ISO Abbr: Clin. Experiment. Ophthalmol.|
|Keywords:||contact lenses adverse effects, corneal ulcer epidemiology, eye infections, bacterial epidemiology, population surveillance methods, adolescent, adult, australia epidemiology, contact lenses statistics & numerical data, corneal ulcer microbiology, epidemiologic methods, eye infections, bacterial etiology, humans, incidence, internet, middle aged, New Zealand epidemiology, ophthalmology statistics & numerical data, optometry statistics & numerical data, pilot projects, rural health statistics & numerical data, urban health statistics & numerical data|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300)|
|Divisions:||Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation|
|Deposited On:||20 May 2009 22:07|
|Last Modified:||10 Aug 2011 17:36|
Repository Staff Only: item control page