Enhancing value for money in public private partnership projects : findings from a survey conducted in Hong Kong and Australia compared to findings from previous research in the UK
Cheung, Esther, Chan, Albert, & Kajewski, Stephen L. (2009) Enhancing value for money in public private partnership projects : findings from a survey conducted in Hong Kong and Australia compared to findings from previous research in the UK. Journal of Financia Management of Property and Construction, 14(1), pp. 7-20.
This paper studies the measures that enhance Value for Money (VFM) in PPP projects from the findings achieved in a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire survey was conducted in Hong Kong (also known as the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region) and Australia, and is compared to the results conducted by other researchers (Li, 2003) in the United Kingdom. Respondents were asked to rate eighteen VFM measures in PPP projects. The results found that the top five VFM measures ranked by the respondents from Hong Kong included (1) Efficient risk allocation (allocating the risk to the party best able to manage it); (2) Output based specification; (3) Competitive tender; (4) Private management skill; and (5) Private sector technical innovation. The first and second of these VFM measures were also found to be ranked high by the respondents from Australia and the United Kingdom, indicating that these were true for these jurisdictions. When the risks are handled well less pitfalls are experienced and as a result VFM is more achievable. Hence an efficient risk allocation is vital in determining whether VFM can be achieved in PPP projects. A clear output based specification can enable a more obvious project design and concept hence minimizing the possibility of delivering the wrong product for the user. Therefore this measure is also important in determining whether VFM has been achieved for a PPP venture. Despite the interest in PPP, there is need for more systematic and in-depth research to examine the measures that enhance VFM in PPP projects in Hong Kong. In addition this project also forms a comparative study for the use of PPP in Hong Kong, Australia and The United Kingdom.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Hong Kong, Australia, United Kingdom, Partnership, Public sector organisations, Private sector organisations|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > ENGINEERING (090000) > CIVIL ENGINEERING (090500) > Construction Engineering (090502)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200) > Building Construction Management and Project Planning (120201)
|Divisions:||Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering|
Past > Schools > School of Urban Development
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2009 Emerald|
|Deposited On:||01 Jun 2009 16:50|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:54|
Repository Staff Only: item control page