Literacy pedagogies that may ‘make a difference’
In this paper we analyse literacy pedagogies in a state-designated disadvantaged secondary school. The specific purpose of the analysis is to identify modes of pedagogy that may make a difference in the overall literacy outcomes of students attending these schools in general, and targeted ‘at risk’ groups including Samoan students. Interview data collected from Samoan paraprofessionals working in low socio-economic schools, in addition to the research literature on Pacific Islander students, are used to identify salient features of effective pedagogies. This information is used to orient the analysis of classroom data collected from one case study secondary school. The analytic focus is on the accomplishment of disruptive student behaviour within the enactment of everyday classroom interaction; specifically, the transition between whole class spoken preparatory discourse and individual seatwork. The analytic framework consists of concepts from Basil Bernstein’s sociological theory of pedagogy that give purchase on the explicitness of teacher control of ‘the what’ of instruction (content or subject matter) and ‘the how’ (interactive forms of teacher-student relations). The general finding of the study is that less explicit teacher control of the selection and organization of knowledge are associated with the disruptive student behaviours identified as sources of disadvantage by the Samoan paraprofessionals. In addition, some general features of literacy pedagogies that may ‘make a difference’ in educational outcomes for students enrolled in the designated disadvantaged secondary school are identified.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||literacy, educational disadvantage, explicit pedagogy, disruptive classroom behaviours|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > EDUCATION (130000)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2001 Taylor & Francis|
|Copyright Statement:||First published in Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 29(1):pp. 49-71.|
|Deposited On:||21 Oct 2005|
|Last Modified:||11 Aug 2011 00:09|
Repository Staff Only: item control page