The use of belief theory to assess driver’s vigilance
Gruyer, Dominique, Rakotonirainy, Andry, & Vrignon, Jeremy (2005) The use of belief theory to assess driver’s vigilance. In Australasian Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference, 16-18 Nov 2005, Wellington NZ.
Human error has been implicated as a causative factor in 85% of drivers’ and operators’ crashes, and lack of vigilance has been identified as the single most important factor in incidents involving human error. Driver vigilance could decline with sleepiness, fatigue or monotony. In Queensland, inattention and fatigue respectively contribute to 27% and 5% of reported crashes. Vigilance decline is characterised by an increased or absence of response to critical events. The current technology to assess and prevent vigilance decline is based on the isolate use of a particular device such as eye tracker or steering wheel movements. The reliability of these devices is debatable as the value of the readings could be highly inaccurate, uncertain, partial, conflictual or unreliable. Furthermore, there has been very little research examining the use of multiple devices to diagnose vigilance decline.
The aim of this paper is to use belief theory to assess driver’s vigilance. Belief theory is a formal tool suitable for representing the inaccuracy, uncertainty and asynchnocity of knowledge. Our approach consists of merging a set of measurements, related to the environment, driver, and vehicle, gathered from different Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). This paper presents the theoretical basis leading to the development of an advanced in-vehicle system capable of assessing vigilance decline. The development of such a tool has a potential to be a major contributor to reducing death and injury rates due hypovigilance related driver’s errors.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Conference Paper|
|Additional Information:||The contents of this conference can be freely accessed online via the publisher's web page (see link).|
|Keywords:||road safety, Intelligent Transport Systems|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES (170000)|
|Divisions:||Current > Research Centres > Centre for Accident Research & Road Safety - Qld (CARRS-Q)
Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2005 (please consult author)|
|Deposited On:||22 Nov 2005|
|Last Modified:||10 Aug 2011 14:24|
Repository Staff Only: item control page