Practice briefing : Is BOT the best financing model to procure infrastructure projects? A case study of the Hong Kong-Shuhai-Macau Bridge

Cheung, Esther & Chan, Albert (2009) Practice briefing : Is BOT the best financing model to procure infrastructure projects? A case study of the Hong Kong-Shuhai-Macau Bridge. Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 27(3), pp. 290-302.

[img] Published Version (PDF 242kB)
Administrators only | Request a copy from author

View at publisher


Abstract: Purpose – Several major infrastructure projects in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) have been delivered by the build-operate-transfer (BOT) model since the 1960s. Although the benefits of using BOT have been reported abundantly in the contemporary literature, some BOT projects were less successful than the others. This paper aims to find out why this is so and to explore whether BOT is the best financing model to procure major infrastructure projects.

Design/methodology/approach – The benefits of BOT will first be reviewed. Some completed BOT projects in Hong Kong will be examined to ascertain how far the perceived benefits of BOT have been materialized in these projects. A highly profiled project, the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macau Bridge, which has long been promoted by the governments of the People's Republic of China, Macau Special Administrative Region and the HKSAR that BOT is the preferred financing model, but suddenly reverted back to the traditional financing model to be funded primarily by the three governments with public money instead, will be studied to explore the true value of the BOT financial model.

Findings – Six main reasons for this radical change are derived from the analysis: shorter take-off time for the project; difference in legal systems causing difficulties in drafting BOT agreements; more government control on tolls; private sector uninterested due to unattractive economic package; avoid allegation of collusion between business and the governments; and a comfortable financial reserve possessed by the host governments.

Originality/value – The findings from this paper are believed to provide a better understanding to the real benefits of BOT and the governments' main decision criteria in delivering major infrastructure projects.

Impact and interest:

6 citations in Scopus
Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

ID Code: 29782
Item Type: Journal Article
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Financing, Financial Modelling, Procurement, Hong Kong
DOI: 10.1108/14635780910951984
ISSN: 1463-578X
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > ENGINEERING (090000) > CIVIL ENGINEERING (090500) > Infrastructure Engineering and Asset Management (090505)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > BANKING FINANCE AND INVESTMENT (150200)
Divisions: Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering
Past > Schools > School of Urban Development
Copyright Owner: Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Copyright Statement:

Copyright principles

Emerald Group Publishing Limited seeks to retain copyright of the articles it publishes, without the author giving up their rights to use their own material. Authors are not required to seek Emerald's permission to re-use their own work. As an author with Emerald you can use your paper in part or in full, including figures and tables if you want to do so in a book, in another article written for us or another publisher, on your website, or any other use, without asking us first. We believe that this copyright policy benefits our authors by ensuring that we can:

* Develop our electronic publications and their delivery to meet customer needs and create maximum dissemination of authors' work.

* Protect authors' moral rights and their work from plagiarism, unlawful copying and any other infringement of copyright.

* Recoup copyright fees from reproduction rights organizations to reinvest in new initiatives and author/user services, such as the Research Fund Awards and the Outstanding Doctoral Research Awards.

* Provide an efficient service for permissions.

Emerald Authors

Please note that when an author publishes in an Emerald publication, they retain the right to:

* Distribute copies of their own published article for educational purposes

* Reuse or republish part or all of their article in a presentation, dissertation, journal article or book edited by themselves

* Post the pre-print or final accepted version of their paper (not the journal PDF) in an institutional or subject repository

* Authors do not need to request our permission for any of the above but if you require written permission for your publisher, please contact

Deposited On: 24 Aug 2011 23:14
Last Modified: 24 Aug 2011 23:16

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page