Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: reasons and implications for meta-analyses
Mengersen, Kerrie & Peters, Jaime (2008) Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: reasons and implications for meta-analyses. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 31(4), pp. 370-389.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Bias, Confounding, Epidemiology, Meta-analysis, Selective reporting|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (010000) > STATISTICS (010400) > Applied Statistics (010401)|
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES (010000) > STATISTICS (010400) > Biostatistics (010402)
|Divisions:||Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Science and Technology|
|Deposited On:||12 Feb 2010 22:44|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 23:51|
Repository Staff Only: item control page