A comparison of the TMS-1 and the corneal analysis system for the evaluation of abnormal corneas
Antalis, John J., Lembach, Richard G., & Carney, Leo G. (1993) A comparison of the TMS-1 and the corneal analysis system for the evaluation of abnormal corneas. The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, 19(1), pp. 58-63.
We used two computerized corneal topography instruments (EyeSys Laboratories' Corneal Analysis System and the Topographic Modeling System (TMS-1) from Computed Anatomy, Inc.] to evaluate 18 eyes (ten patients) with abnormal corneas. The diagnoses included keratoconus, corneal scars, and residual postoperative astigmatism following refractive surgery. The patients were randomly selected from a busy corneal practice to include those with significant corneal refractive error whose management, it was believed, would benefit from corneal topography imaging. Images were taken with both systems, and comparisons were made of the ease of operation, the accuracy of corneal readings, and the usefulness of generated data. Three millimeter zone (Corneal Analysis System) and Simulated Keratometry (TMS-1) values were also compared to each other and to standard keratometric readings. We found the two systems to be very similar in their application and results, although certain differences were apparent in terms of operation, patient acceptance, and the ability to obtain useful data from the more distorted corneas. Neither system worked ideally for severely irregular surfaces.
Impact and interest:
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Cornea/, pathology, Corneal Diseases/, pathology, Image Processing, Computer, Assisted/, instrumentation, Ophthalmology/, instrumentation, Adult, Comparative Study, Evaluation Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Reproducibility of Results, Research Support, Non, U, S, Gov't, Sensitivity and Specificity|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > OPTOMETRY AND OPHTHALMOLOGY (111300)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health|
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 1993 Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists|
|Copyright Statement:||Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.|
|Deposited On:||31 Jan 2006|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2010 22:29|
Repository Staff Only: item control page