Identifying work related injuries : comparison of methods for interrogating text fields
McKenzie, Kirsten, Campbell, Margaret, Scott, Deborah A., Discoll, Tim, Harrison, James E., & McClure, Roderick J. (2010) Identifying work related injuries : comparison of methods for interrogating text fields. B M C Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 10(19), pp. 1-28.
Work-related injuries in Australia are estimated to cost around $57.5 billion annually,
however there are currently insufficient surveillance data available to support an
evidence-based public health response. Emergency departments (ED) in Australia are
a potential source of information on work-related injuries though most ED’s do not
have an ‘Activity Code’ to identify work-related cases with information about the
presenting problem recorded in a short free text field. This study compared methods
for interrogating text fields for identifying work-related injuries presenting at
emergency departments to inform approaches to surveillance of work-related injury.----------
Three approaches were used to interrogate an injury description text field to classify
cases as work-related: keyword search, index search, and content analytic text mining.
Sensitivity and specificity were examined by comparing cases flagged by each
approach to cases coded with an Activity code during triage. Methods to improve the
sensitivity and/or specificity of each approach were explored by adjusting the
classification techniques within each broad approach.----------
The basic keyword search detected 58% of cases (Specificity 0.99), an index search
detected 62% of cases (Specificity 0.87), and the content analytic text mining (using
adjusted probabilities) approach detected 77% of cases (Specificity 0.95).----------
The findings of this study provide strong support for continued development of text
searching methods to obtain information from routine emergency department data, to
improve the capacity for comprehensive injury surveillance.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > PUBLIC HEALTH AND HEALTH SERVICES (111700) > Health Information Systems (incl. Surveillance) (111711)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health|
Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Current > Schools > School of Public Health & Social Work
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2010 [please consult the authors]|
|Deposited On:||16 Apr 2010 10:40|
|Last Modified:||10 Apr 2013 10:05|
Repository Staff Only: item control page