On the cognitive effectiveness of routing symbols in process modeling languages
Figl, Kathrin, Mendling, Jan, Strembeck, Mark, & Recker, Jan C. (2010) On the cognitive effectiveness of routing symbols in process modeling languages. In Abramowicz, Witold & Tolksdorf, Robert (Eds.) Business Information Systems : Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Business Information Systems, Springer, Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, pp. 230-241.
Process models provide visual support for analyzing and improving complex organizational processes. In this paper, we discuss differences of process modeling languages using cognitive effectiveness considerations, to make statements about the ease of use and quality of user experience. Aspects of cognitive effectiveness are of importance for learning a modeling language, creating models, and understanding models. We identify the criteria representational clarity, perceptual discriminability, perceptual immediacy, visual expressiveness, and graphic parsimony to compare and assess the cognitive effectiveness of different modeling languages. We apply these criteria in an analysis of the routing elements of UML Activity Diagrams, YAWL, BPMN, and EPCs, to uncover their relative strengths and weaknesses from a quality of user experience perspective. We draw conclusions that are relevant to the usability of these languages in business process modeling projects.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Conference Paper|
|Keywords:||Process modeling, cognitive analysis, UML, YAWL, BPMN|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCES (080000) > INFORMATION SYSTEMS (080600) > Conceptual Modelling (080603)|
|Divisions:||Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Science and Technology
Past > Schools > Information Systems
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2010 Springer|
This is the author-version of the work.
Conference proceedings published, by Springer Verlag, will be available via SpringerLink. http://www.springerlink.com
|Deposited On:||19 May 2010 04:35|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 14:29|
Repository Staff Only: item control page