QUT ePrints

Reply to Douglas Kellner

Page, James S. (2004) Reply to Douglas Kellner. Critical Discourse Studies, 1(2), pp. 261-266.

View at publisher

Abstract

This article responds to the analysis by Douglas Kellner of the way the Bush Administration has manipulated media coverage, especially coverage of the attacks of 11/9/01, to support an aggressive foreign policy. The writer is generally in agreement with the analysis, although the article makes posits five propositions: 1) there is nothing new in using terror and atrocity as a pretext for war, 2) the attacks and response reflects a deeply ingrained culture of violence, including within the USA, 3) the current conflict is profoundly theological in nature, 4) the discourse of the US Administration reveals a profound ignorance of the possible motivations of the attackers, and 5) the portrayal of the attacks and the response reveals the continuing atavistic appeal of violence. By way of conclusion, it is suggested that there needs to be an on-going commitment towards educating for a culture of peace and that developing a critique of militaristic discourse is one start to this.

Impact and interest:

Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

1,030 since deposited on 02 Mar 2006
160 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 3641
Item Type: Journal Article
Keywords: mass media, corporate media, media manipulation, Gulf War never happened, Gulf War did not take place, cultural critic, Jean Baudrillard, mass mediated, experienced reality, objective events, objective reality, Jihadist, Jihadism, attack, World Trade Centre, Pentagon, 2001, social trauma, 9/11, Douglas Kellner, US, United States, USA, United States, America, American, Bush Administration, George W, Bush, pretext, illegal, immoral, war, terror, atrocity, Maine, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, German, Belgium, U, boats, ethnic Germans, Sudentenland, Pland, Communist, ethnic cleansing, rationale for war, protection, innocent lives, non, combatants, premeditated killing of civilians, publicity, just war, last resort, prospects of success, principle of proportionality, war on terror, so, called war, phenomenon of 11/9/01, symbolism, symbolic, global capitalism, military power, media spectacle, military extravaganza, military extravaganzas, imperialistic agenda, television, dramatize terror, dramatize violence, live television footage, immediacy, victim, contemporary society, popular culture, theological, nature of war, televangelists, fundamentalist imagination, cosmic struggle, good and evil, Christian fundamentalists, Christian fundamentalism, Islam, religion of toleration, protect the faithful, religion of Jesus, irenic, discourse of the Bush Administration, ignorance, structural violence, martyr, self, sacrifice, war memorials, noble, heroic, unprovoked, role of the United States, global hegemon, unjust, global social order, atavistic, appeal of violence, appeal of war, protestations of horror, pacifist, theologian, Stanley Hauwerwas, sense of purpose, defeat of communism, Desiderius Erasmus, discourse of war, deconstructs, appealing narrative, war, violence, education for peace, education for a culture of peace, culture of violence, United Nations, UN, UNESCO, declarations, James Smith Page
DOI: 10.1080/1740590042000302094
ISSN: 1740-5912
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LANGUAGES COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE (200000) > COMMUNICATION AND MEDIA STUDIES (200100) > Communication and Media Studies not elsewhere classified (200199)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LANGUAGES COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE (200000) > CULTURAL STUDIES (200200) > Postcolonial Studies (200211)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2004 Taylor and Francis
Copyright Statement: First published in Critical Discourse Studies 1(2):pp. 264-266.
Deposited On: 02 Mar 2006
Last Modified: 01 Sep 2010 22:39

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page