What are they thinking? Considerations underlying negotiators’ ethical decisions

Rivers, Cheryl J. (2004) What are they thinking? Considerations underlying negotiators’ ethical decisions. In Academy of International Business 2004 Annual Meeting, July 10 - 13,, July 10 - 13, 2004, Stockhom, Sweden. (Unpublished)


Mismatched ethical expectations between international business negotiators are one of the biggest barriers to bridging the communication gap that exists. Using inappropriate tactics can hinder the negotiation process and cause breakdown. Despite this, there is scant understanding of what negotiators think about in their choice of tactics. This paper extends current understanding of ethical decision making in negotiation by presenting a study that uses multi-dimensional scaling (MDS) analysis of Australian negotiators’ ratings of appropriateness of ethically ambiguous negotiation tactics. Four dimensions that underlie these ratings are identified. These are the immediacy of impact of the tactic; the impression using the tactic gives to the other party; the level of emotional commitment required to execute a tactic; and, how clearly the intended signal will be received by the other party. Likely cross-cultural differences in these dimensions and their influence on perceptions of appropriateness of ethically ambiguous negotiation tactics are discussed. This information can be used by negotiators to help them decide which tactics to avoid in their international business negotiations and which tactics will not damage the bridge being built by the negotiators to bring them together.

Impact and interest:

Search Google Scholar™

Citation counts are sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science® citation databases.

These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.

Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.

Full-text downloads:

904 since deposited on 20 Aug 2004
47 in the past twelve months

Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.

ID Code: 366
Item Type: Conference Paper
Refereed: Yes
Keywords: Negotiation ethics, ethical decision making, ethically ambiguous negotiation tactics, EANTs
Subjects: Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > COMMERCE MANAGEMENT TOURISM AND SERVICES (150000) > BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT (150300)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PHILOSOPHY AND RELIGIOUS STUDIES (220000) > APPLIED ETHICS (220100) > Applied Ethics not elsewhere classified (220199)
Divisions: Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > QUT Business School
Copyright Owner: Copyright 2004 (please consult author)
Deposited On: 20 Aug 2004 00:00
Last Modified: 05 Jan 2011 13:23

Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX

Repository Staff Only: item control page