Combating cyclops : critical approaches to media literacy and popular culture in senior English
Jetnikoff, Anita (2006) Combating cyclops : critical approaches to media literacy and popular culture in senior English. English in Australia, 41(1).
In recent press reports, the ongoing debate about low and high culture in English has reared its ugly head like Cyclops. A traditional viewpoint, which privileges Literature over 'everyday' texts, like Cyclops, is rather one-eyed, since it is based on the false assumption that students are no longer studying the literary 'classics.' In this conservative argument, 'low' or 'pop' culture is represented as devoid of aesthetics or moral worth, whilst Literature supposedly paves the way for 'truth and beauty'(Slattery, 2005, p. 10). All texts produced by a culture both reflect the culture itself and the wider world in some way, (Moon, 2001, p. 72) and ironically journalists who in the manner of Cyclops, 'forge the furious thunder,' over the demise of the English curriculum present their work through 'everyday' textual forms. Perhaps a hidden agenda is to silence an informed critique of that 'popular' text – the broadsheet. If students are taught to read critically, they are better equipped to question opinions they might encounter in print and elsewhere. In practice, English teachers and students haven't stopped studying Literature. Popular culture works have been included for study alongside, in conjunction with and juxtaposed against the literary canon. Literature is now approached differently. As English teachers we continue to study Macbeth alongside MacDonalds and Supersize Me.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Literature, pop culture, popular culture, English Curriculum, literature vs everyday text debate, media in English, critical literacy|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education
Past > Schools > School of Cultural & Language Studies in Education
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2006 AATE|
|Copyright Statement:||Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.|
|Deposited On:||30 Nov 2006|
|Last Modified:||29 Feb 2012 13:19|
Repository Staff Only: item control page