Benchmarking clinical indicators of quality for Australian residential aged care facilities
Courtney, Mary D., O'Reilly, Maria T., Edwards, Helen E., & Hassall, Stacey L. (2010) Benchmarking clinical indicators of quality for Australian residential aged care facilities. Australian Health Review, 34(1), pp. 93-100.
To undertake exploratory benchmarking of a set of clinical indicators of quality care in residential care in
Australia, data were collected from 107 residents within four medium-sized facilities (40–80 beds) in Brisbane, Australia. The proportion of residents in each sample facility with a particular clinical problem was compared with US Minimum Data Set quality indicator thresholds. Results demonstrated variability within and between clinical indicators, suggesting breadth of assessment using various clinical indicators of quality is an important factor when monitoring quality of care. More comprehensive and objective measures of quality of care would be of great assistance in determining and monitoring the effectiveness of residential aged care provision in Australia, particularly as demands for accountability by consumers and
their families increase.
What is known about the topic? The key to quality improvement is effective quality assessment, and one means of evaluating quality of care is through clinical outcomes. The Minimum Data Set quality indicators have been credited with improving quality in United States nursing homes.
What does this paper add? The Clinical Care Indicators Tool was used to collect data on clinical outcomes, enabling
comparison of data from a small Australian sample with American quality benchmarks to illustrate the utility of providing guidelines for interpretation. What are the implications for practitioners? Collecting and comparing clinical outcome data would enable practitioners to better understand the quality of care being provided and whether practices required review. The Clinical Care Indicator
Tool could provide a comprehensive and systematic means of doing this, thus filling a gap in quality monitoring within
Australian residential aged care.
Citation countsare sourced monthly fromand citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||clinical indicators, US Minimum Data Set , quality of care|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES (110000) > NURSING (111000)|
|Divisions:||Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health|
Current > Schools > School of Nursing
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2010 CSIRO Publishing|
|Deposited On:||15 Nov 2010 07:57|
|Last Modified:||01 Mar 2012 00:15|
Repository Staff Only: item control page