Talking the talk : oracy demands in first year university assessment tasks
Doherty, Catherine A., Kettle, Margaret A., May, Lynette A., & Caukill, Emma (2011) Talking the talk : oracy demands in first year university assessment tasks. Assessment in Education, 18(1), pp. 27-39.
This is the latest version of this eprint.
| 18 months embargo period (PDF 230Kb) Accepted Version. |
Abstract
With more constructivist approaches to learning in higher education and more value on teamwork skills, students’ oracy (speaking and listening) features more prominently in curriculum, pedagogy and assessment. The paper reports on a study of two first-year Australian university courses in disciplines with explicit industry orientations and high proportions of international students. Drawing on classroom observations and interviews with the lecturers, this paper investigates their pedagogical designs on oracy and the oracy demands of their assessment tasks. The study found that talk-based assessment tasks (a group project and a group oral presentation) featured in both courses but the two courses treated students’ oracy differently: as product or process. The contrast between the two assessment designs explicates issues around EAL student needs, authentic links to industry, the provenance of criteria used to assess performance, perceptions about the relevance of talk and the ‘hidden assessment’ of oracy.
Citations:
Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
| ID Code: | 39710 |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
| Keywords: | oracy, assessment, groupwork, higher education, EAL students |
| DOI: | 10.1080/0969594X.2010.498775 |
| ISSN: | 0969-594X |
| Subjects: | Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > EDUCATION (130000) > EDUCATION SYSTEMS (130100) > Higher Education (130103) Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > EDUCATION (130000) > SPECIALIST STUDIES IN EDUCATION (130300) > Education Assessment and Evaluation (130303) Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > LANGUAGES COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE (200000) > LINGUISTICS (200400) > Applied Linguistics and Educational Linguistics (200401) |
| Divisions: | Current > Research Centres > Office of Education Research Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Education Past > Schools > School of Cultural & Language Studies in Education |
| Copyright Owner: | Copyright 2011 Taylor & Francis |
| Copyright Statement: | This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of Taylor & Francis for personal use, not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Volume 18 Issue 1, February 2011. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2010.498775 (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.498775) |
| Deposited On: | 28 Jan 2011 08:28 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Sep 2012 00:10 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Talking the talk : oracy demands in first year university assessment tasks. (deposited 28 Jan 2011 08:28)[Currently Displayed]
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page