Predicting the probability of winning sealed bid auctions: a comparison of models
Skitmore, Martin (2002) Predicting the probability of winning sealed bid auctions: a comparison of models. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 53(1), pp. 47-56.
This paper is concerned with predicting the probability of tendering the lowest bid in sealed bid auctions. Four of the leading models from the bidding literature are shown to be subsumed within a general model – differing only in their method of parameter estimation. These models are then tested relative to the equal probability model by an empirical analysis of a large sample of real construction contract bidding data via all-in, one-out and one-on sample frames. A binomial test is used to measure the ability to predict the identity of the lowest bidders and the average logscore is used to measure the ability to predict the probability of each bidder being the lowest. Optimal cut-off criterion values are determined for defining the minimum size of dataset needed for disaggregating bidders. The work also highlights the importance of (1) the treatment of new entrants and general shortage of data on individual bidders, and (2) the treatment of predicted ties.
Impact and interest:
Citation counts are sourced monthly from and citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science® generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from theindexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads displays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Keywords:||Bidding models, bidding theory, construction contracts, empirical tests, predicted probability, probability of lowest bid, sealed bid auctions, tendering theory, binomial test, logscore test|
|Subjects:||Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200) > Quantity Surveying (120203)
Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND DESIGN (120000) > BUILDING (120200) > Building Construction Management and Project Planning (120201)
|Divisions:||Past > QUT Faculties & Divisions > Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering|
|Copyright Owner:||Copyright 2002 Palgrave Macmillan|
|Copyright Statement:||This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Journal of the Operational Research Society . The definitive publisher-authenticated version Skitmore, Martin (2002) Predicting the probability of winning sealed bid auctions: a comparison of models. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53(1):pp. 47-56 is available online at: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/jors/index.html|
|Deposited On:||16 May 2006 00:00|
|Last Modified:||09 Jun 2010 12:32|
Repository Staff Only: item control page