A comparison of registered and unregistered organ donors’ perceptions about transplant recipients
Hyde, Melissa K. & White, Katherine M. (2011) A comparison of registered and unregistered organ donors’ perceptions about transplant recipients. Clinical Transplantation, 25(3), pp. 444-449.
Abstract
Background: We examined whether registered and unregistered donors’ perceptions about transplant recipients’ previous behavior (e.g., substance use) and responsibility for illness differed based on their deceased organ donor registration decisions. ----- ----- -----
Methods: Students and community members from Queensland, Australia were surveyed about their perceptions of transplant recipients.----- ----- -----
Results: Respondents (N = 465) were grouped based on their organ donor registration status to determine if their perceptions about transplant recipients differed. Compared to registered respondents, a higher proportion of unregistered respondents held more negative and less favorable perceptions of recipients. Multivariate analysis of variance confirmed statistically that unregistered respondents evaluated recipients more negatively than registered respondents, F(6,449) = 5.33, p <.001. Unregistered respondents were more likely to view recipients as a smoker, substance user, or alcohol dependent and as undeserving of a transplant, blameworthy, and responsible for their illness. ----- ----- -----
Conclusion: Potential donors’ perceptions of transplant recipients’ behavior and responsibility for illness differ according to their registration status. Future interventions should challenge negative perceptions about recipients’ deservingness and responsibility and promote the perspective that people from all walks of life need transplants in the aim of ultimately encouraging an increase in donor registration.
Citations:
Citation countsare sourced monthly from Scopus and Web of Science citation databases.
These databases contain citations from different subsets of available publications and different time periods and thus the citation count from each is usually different. Some works are not in either database and no count is displayed. Scopus includes citations from articles published in 1996 onwards, and Web of Science generally from 1980 onwards.
Citations counts from the Google Scholar™ indexing service can be viewed at the linked Google Scholar™ search.
Full-text downloads:
Full-text downloadsdisplays the total number of times this work’s files (e.g., a PDF) have been downloaded from QUT ePrints as well as the number of downloads in the previous 365 days. The count includes downloads for all files if a work has more than one.
| ID Code: | 41780 |
|---|---|
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
| Additional Information: | Article first published online: 6 MAY 2010 |
| Keywords: | organ donation, organ recipient |
| DOI: | 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01257.x |
| ISSN: | 1399-0012 |
| Subjects: | Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification > PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES (170000) > PSYCHOLOGY (170100) > Health Clinical and Counselling Psychology (170106) |
| Divisions: | Current > QUT Faculties and Divisions > Faculty of Health Current > Institutes > Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation Current > Schools > School of Psychology & Counselling |
| Copyright Owner: | Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. |
| Deposited On: | 25 May 2011 07:48 |
| Last Modified: | 01 Mar 2012 06:12 |
Export: EndNote | Dublin Core | BibTeX
Repository Staff Only: item control page